| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 17:32, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Current IUSE flags look like. |
| 8 |
> > "X bootstrap build f77 gcj hardened java multilib nls objc static |
| 9 |
> > uclibc" |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What is the difference between the java and gcj use flags here? /me isn't |
| 12 |
> up on all of the various gcc compile options. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
For historic reasons currently you need both java and gcj in USE to have |
| 16 |
gcj support built ... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
As I said in another mail, I do not think we should add gcj to the |
| 19 |
default USE flags, as it is huge, and most people do not use it ... |
| 20 |
opinions? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Another thought might be to drop the 'if use java && use gcj' and rather |
| 23 |
make it 'if use gcj' to check weather to build gcj support or not ... |
| 24 |
Ideas? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 30 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 31 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives