| 1 |
you =|= we |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
As far as I remember ;-) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:48 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 6 |
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:37 +0200, Peter Weber wrote: |
| 7 |
> > And why you include stage3? Stage3 within a network based installation |
| 8 |
> > is complet nonsens. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> First, stage3 is the *only* supported installation, so it makes perfect |
| 11 |
> sense. Second, a stage3 tarball can be used via both the Installer (it |
| 12 |
> has a URI browser) *and* on the command line for network-based installs. |
| 13 |
> Finally, I don't answer to you. I've already explained on another list |
| 14 |
> to you that we are *not* interested in supporting *your* idea of what a |
| 15 |
> network-less installation should be, and have moved on to something we |
| 16 |
> consider better. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> At this point, you have three choices. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> #1. Accept it |
| 21 |
> #2. Build it yourself |
| 22 |
> #3. Go away |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I honestly don't care which one you do, but the one that I will not |
| 25 |
> allow you to do is to try to force us to do something we do not wish to |
| 26 |
> do with our volunteer time. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Good day, |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives