| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> So... What do we say to going nptl across the board for 2006.0 on every |
| 7 |
> platform that supports 2.6 headers? This would, of course, require |
| 8 |
> approval from each arch team, but I'm sure ppc and amd64 are chomping at |
| 9 |
> the bits for this one, and it sounds like the x86 arch team is wanting |
| 10 |
> it also. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So... any comments? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Even once we get 2.6 headers in an non-development profile, nptl is not |
| 15 |
currently working on SPARC in glibc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers, |
| 18 |
- -- |
| 19 |
Jason Wever |
| 20 |
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFDKtRNdKvgdVioq28RApdiAJ9p5x8YaHEywY2ZV7U3yxdlcJAtdQCeNflH |
| 25 |
kFqOAwXLmkiuBQ2Kl5pl8t8= |
| 26 |
=9K9t |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives