| 1 |
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 16:00 +0200, Michiel de Bruijne wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 23 October 2006 14:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > What would be best is if it looked for x.y.z first, then fell back to |
| 4 |
> > x.y, in the case of us not being as fast with the config as the kernel |
| 5 |
> > team with the kernel. ;] |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Another thing to realize is that while I will apply new configs/patches, |
| 8 |
> > I'm not planning on making a genkernel release for changes as minor as a |
| 9 |
> > new config. What I would suggest is that we make the "2.4" and "2.6" |
| 10 |
> > configs be equal to the latest config, with the x.y.z being preferred, |
| 11 |
> > if it exists. That way, when a new kernel comes out, it will start out |
| 12 |
> > using the last good config, until it gets updated with its own x.y.z |
| 13 |
> > config. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Ok, do you want patches againt 3.4.2? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
3.4.3, actually... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I just added it this morning and it currently matches SVN, for the most |
| 20 |
part. You can also check |
| 21 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/genkernel/trunk/ to see what the |
| 22 |
current SVN status is. I did update the kernel sources today to add |
| 23 |
lm_sensors and AGP/DRM support. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 27 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 28 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 29 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 30 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives