| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Guy Martin wrote: |
| 5 |
| On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 23:25:03 -0500 |
| 6 |
| John Davis <zhen@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
|>- -If you have not already, please get your kernel .configs for both 2.4 |
| 10 |
|>and 2.6 (if possible) to drobbins and brad_mssw *IMMEDIATELY*. We need |
| 11 |
|>those .configs to make livecds. |
| 12 |
| |
| 13 |
| |
| 14 |
| I just finisehd to port genkernel on hppa but I only did it for 32 bit |
| 15 |
2.4 kernels. I'll need more time to create a 2.6 config because it still |
| 16 |
really unstable on parisc (i.e. scsi drivers b0rked). For 64 bit kernels |
| 17 |
(some box require it) there is more work to do. I just integrated a |
| 18 |
64bit toolchain into portage which need a little testing (I think SpanKY |
| 19 |
is testing it). 2.4 64bit kernel config is done but still need to be |
| 20 |
ported into genkernel (issues with insmod and so on). Also, I'll have to |
| 21 |
work with lu_zero to port gcloop for 64bit. |
| 22 |
| |
| 23 |
| |
| 24 |
|>- -Test week starts the 7th. We are still on track to make 2004.0 by the |
| 25 |
|>22nd, so start thinking about snapping the portage tree and getting your |
| 26 |
|>testing started. Check the releng page for all essential parts that are |
| 27 |
|>needed to constitute a release (portage snap, relnotes, stages, grp, etc). |
| 28 |
| |
| 29 |
| |
| 30 |
| I consider the actual portage really stable for hppa. I've done all I |
| 31 |
can do to have it up to date. Btw, I'm in exams now. That means that |
| 32 |
I'll not be able to work on this until Jan 16 but most part of the job |
| 33 |
is done. I got portages snap, stages, grp, all in testing phase. I'll |
| 34 |
need to rebuild everything because of some bugs fixed and portage which |
| 35 |
have been updated in the meantime. This takes 3-4 days or perhaps more |
| 36 |
if I add kde to grp. |
| 37 |
| |
| 38 |
| |
| 39 |
|>- -Arch leads, please mail me a status report on how things are going. |
| 40 |
| |
| 41 |
| |
| 42 |
| Do you need to know anything else ? |
| 43 |
| |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Guy - |
| 46 |
That should be fine :) Like I said to Kumba, don't kill yourself for |
| 47 |
2.6. If it is not stable, then don't release it. You can always follow |
| 48 |
up w/ 2.6 in 2004.1. As for gcloop, last time I heard we are not using |
| 49 |
it this release on our livecds, so don't kill yourself on that either. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Cheers, |
| 52 |
//zhen |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
BTW - What's happening over in x86, PPC, and SPARC land? |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
- -- |
| 57 |
John Davis |
| 58 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 59 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen> |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
- ---- |
| 62 |
Knowledge can be more terrible than ignorance if you're powerless to |
| 63 |
change your world. |
| 64 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 65 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 66 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
iD8DBQE/+InfZlASNRlGLUcRAt3eAKDB5/FeWshE++48iZZRCWrD2r+v5ACgzdPF |
| 69 |
pQZV7ngG74FbiGxNQjWkCwY= |
| 70 |
=wPBZ |
| 71 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-- |
| 75 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives