Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: fbissey@××××××××××××.nz
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] is numpy using the old lapack interface?
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:06:11
Message-Id: 20121101094213.80ogww8oss8c88w4@webmail.slingshot.co.nz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] is numpy using the old lapack interface? by Thomas Kahle
1 Quoting Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>:
2
3 > One more thing, This is fixed in 1.6 tree of numpy, where the
4 > call to gfortran uses what is in the site config.
5 > Will sage move to a higher version of numpy at some point?
6 >
7 >
8 Yes! The problem that prevent us to upgrade numpy is fixed in numpy-1.7. The
9 release cannot come quickly enough for us.
10
11 For numpy 1.5 would by any chance gfortran be called with -fexternal-blas at
12 some point? On my system with python 3.2 lapack was not properly detected,
13 that's why dotblas hasn't been built. Numpy 1.5.1 with python 3.2 used an
14 internal implementation of the lapack functions it uses.
15
16 This probably explains why scipy doesn't compile with numpy 1.5 and
17 python 3.2.
18
19 Francois

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] is numpy using the old lapack interface? Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>