Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "Adam Piątyszek" <ediap@×××××××××××××.PL>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] blas/lapack status
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:07:40
Message-Id: 442D98F4.2080800@et.put.poznan.pl
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] blas/lapack status by "Adam Piątyszek"
1 * Adam Piątyszek [2006-03-23 18:55]:
2 > [...]
3 >> Packages in portage/bugs/overlay which could provide virtual/cblas:
4 >> - blas-atlas
5 >> - acml (although not sure about this one)
6 >
7 > ACML does not provide cblas interface. At least the latest ACML 3.0.0.
8
9 It seems that I was wrong here. ACML has C interface for it's BLAS
10 routines, however it is not compatible with NetLib's, MKL's or ATLAS' CBLAS.
11 Function names does not have "cblas_" prefix and there are some other
12 differences.
13
14 BR,
15
16 /ediap
17
18
19 --
20 -=#=- Adam Piątyszek - "ediap" -=#=- Linux ID: #204648 -=#=-
21 -=#=- ediap (at) et.put.poznan.pl -=#=- JID: ediap (at) chrome.pl -=#=-
22 -=#=- http://ediap.prv.pl/ -=#=- GG: 1157376 -=#=-
23 -=#=- PGP key ID: 0x341E22F0 -=#=- ICQ: 3303291 -=#=-

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature