1 |
On 28/02/13 22:27, Thomas Kahle wrote: |
2 |
> On 22:11 Thu 28 Feb 2013, Francois Bissey wrote: |
3 |
>> This must be new patches. I "forked" the sage-on-gentoo" from the main |
4 |
>> tree 7 days ago. At that time the difference was patches I added based |
5 |
>> on the spkg shipped in sage (one backport from an unreleased version, |
6 |
>> the other won't be merged because what it fixes is being revamped). |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Oh, my bad. The patches are in your version: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> # diff ~up/dev-python/ipython/ipython-0.13.1-r1.ebuild /var/lib/layman/sage-on-gentoo/dev-python/ipython/ipython-0.13.1-r1.ebuild |
11 |
> 3c3 |
12 |
> < # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-python/ipython/ipython-0.13.1-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2013/02/11 15:59:01 mgorny Exp $ |
13 |
> --- |
14 |
>> # $Header: $ |
15 |
> 52a53,54 |
16 |
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-history-backport.patch |
17 |
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}"/prun_timeit_magics.patch |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> OK. What I'm trying to say is: Your mask is irrelevant since the |
21 |
> main-tree version is not masked and emerge want's to install it anyway, |
22 |
> I think? If you intended to not unmask any python-1 ebuilds, then it |
23 |
> failed. |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Not all but you are right. The mask only applies to the content of the |
27 |
overlay. That's by design. I don't like it but we either have to provide |
28 |
keywording for the python-r1 dep or enforce ipython-0.13.1 exactly |
29 |
which is about as bad. |
30 |
|
31 |
Opinions Christopher? |
32 |
|
33 |
Francois |