| 1 |
> On 06/30/2010 10:51 AM, François Bissey wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> Hi, |
| 3 |
> >> |
| 4 |
> >> The way that sage depends on lapack and numpy is broken at the moment. |
| 5 |
> >> Can somebody look at bug 320669 ? |
| 6 |
> >> At least here on x86 it is not possible to get a working sage at the |
| 7 |
> >> moment. Let me know if there is anything I can test or do. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > this is a bit more subtle than that Thomas. I have 2 x86 machines, |
| 10 |
> > one with problems and one without. Christopher doesn't have problems |
| 11 |
> > on his x86 machine either. |
| 12 |
> > Why is this bug not affecting amd64? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Now I'm curious about lapack and friends. It seems that atlas is the |
| 15 |
> current way to go for sage, but I found that in various places |
| 16 |
> "reference" is eselected on my system. |
| 17 |
> Can somebody with a working system post a list of which implementations |
| 18 |
> should be eselected for which package? |
| 19 |
> Maybe someone should update this here too: |
| 20 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/blas-lapack.xml |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
After checking there is currently only one place where we have made a |
| 23 |
hard requirement on atlas and that is in sage-core where we ask for |
| 24 |
lapack-atlas. I have removed the code eselecting lapack-atlas a few days |
| 25 |
ago. If you can test that everything build with reference (you may have to |
| 26 |
edit the ebuild) I may make that dependency into virtual/lapack instead. |
| 27 |
Have you built linbox with blas/cblas/lapack reference as well? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Cheers, |
| 30 |
Francois |
Archives