1 |
On 06/25/2013 12:16 AM, fbissey@××××××××××××.nz wrote: |
2 |
> Quoting Sébastien Fabbro <bicatali@g.o>: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> it is masked. |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> ... and that is irrelavant from a dev perspective. People report bugs |
8 |
>>> and we have to come up with solutions. The mask just makes the problem |
9 |
>>> less urgent. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> we do not have to come up with solutions for glpk api breaks. i could |
13 |
>> have simply not bump glpk in the tree and there will be no bugs. |
14 |
>> masking or subslot dependencies is what we can do without diving into |
15 |
>> upstream code. obviously patches are welcome. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Looking at 4ti2 in particular, that's a substantial amount of code. If you |
18 |
> fix it, that would pretty much get you ownership of it, but I see you |
19 |
> already |
20 |
> have a fork on github with a few commits, Thomas. |
21 |
|
22 |
I was working on a different part of the code though. |
23 |
|
24 |
> So you are after glpk documentation on how to migrate? I haven't seen |
25 |
> anything |
26 |
> useful on glpk's mailing list but it wouldn't hurt to ask there. |
27 |
|
28 |
Yes, a migration guide would be useful, but then again, I'm not |
29 |
interested in investing too much time into this. |
30 |
|
31 |
Cheers, |
32 |
Thomas |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Thomas Kahle |