| 1 |
from usr/portage/sys-cluster/mpich/ChangeLog |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
07 Nov 2005; Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>; |
| 5 |
+mpich-1.2.6-r4.ebuild: |
| 6 |
(#103218) Overrule mpich's broken build system to get datadir set to |
| 7 |
/usr/share/mpich. Also, add dependency on libX11 or virtual/x11 for |
| 8 |
cxgraphics and cpi_anim. I'm open to patches to stop building them and |
| 9 |
prevent the X dependency. In addition, change 'make' to 'emake' to allow |
| 10 |
parallel builds. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Glenn Johnson wrote: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>Is there a way to use lam-mpi for a program (closed source) compiled |
| 18 |
>against mpich? If that is possible then that would be an option. I |
| 19 |
>have never had to have X installed for mpich before. It looks like |
| 20 |
>something that went into the most recent two e-builds. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>On 11/16/05, Philippe Trottier <tchiwam@g.o> wrote: |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>>Glenn Johnson wrote: |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>>>I am trying to upgrade mpich to version 1.2.7_p1 and it wants to |
| 29 |
>>>install xorg and friends. I do not want X11 and have never had it |
| 30 |
>>>installed in the past. Does mpich really need xorg? If not, then how |
| 31 |
>>>can I tell portage about it? |
| 32 |
>>> |
| 33 |
>>>Thanks. |
| 34 |
>>>-- |
| 35 |
>>>Glenn Johnson |
| 36 |
>>> |
| 37 |
>>> |
| 38 |
>>I have stooped using mpich and started use lam-mpi take a look at that ? |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>>I have never tried mpich without X so I cannot say much more. |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>>Phil |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
>>-- |
| 47 |
>>gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
| 48 |
>> |
| 49 |
>> |
| 50 |
>> |
| 51 |
>> |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
>-- |
| 55 |
>Glenn Johnson |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-- |
| 61 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
Archives