1 |
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:29:32 Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 06 December, François Bissey wrote: |
3 |
> > on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I don't know of an official ANSI/ISO C API for clapack. |
6 |
> The netlib clapack implementation is a f2c'ed conversion from |
7 |
> Fortran lapack. There is another clapack in ATLAS, which has a |
8 |
> different API, and does not cover all LAPACK routines. |
9 |
> |
10 |
They are the only 2 that I have seen. It is interesting that there |
11 |
is no official C API. I am guessing linbox is actually expecting ATLAS |
12 |
since there are different API we will put that. |
13 |
That's an important clarification. |
14 |
|
15 |
Thanks, |
16 |
Francois |