| 1 |
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:21:22 +0200, George Shapovalov |
| 2 |
<gshapovalov@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Hi all, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Replying to the list of individual emails in this message, but I also |
| 6 |
> added |
| 7 |
> gentoo-science mailing list - we intended to use it exactly for such |
| 8 |
> discussions |
| 9 |
> after all ;). |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
But isn't the gentoo-science ml primarily a user ml? And wasn't the |
| 13 |
single sci alias intended to serve for what you say gentoo-science is |
| 14 |
for? Not that I want exclude the user base from what I wrote, but I |
| 15 |
wanted to be sure that every active dev gets the mail. |
| 16 |
Problem is, that for sure not all devs are subscribed to either the |
| 17 |
gentoo-science ml or the sci alias. That's why I propose the sci-dev |
| 18 |
alias, so that we can reach all devs without spamming a single one with |
| 19 |
bug noise or similar things. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
justin |
Archives