Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "Sébastien Fabbro" <bicatali@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-science] Re: Gentoo science status
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:25:52
Message-Id: 20100204202530.79efd275@sousie
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] Gentoo science status by "Sébastien Fabbro"
1 > We also need to know whether we still want a leader. Some time ago
2 > the question was raised, but got no definite answer.
3
4 It would be nice to have a head count to see how many of us are active
5 to get an idea how much there is to lead. The mail aliases in
6 dev.g.o are very different than what the project page states, which is
7 different than the last round of head counts. I created an empty
8 dev table on the science overlay draft docs [1]. So each active dev and
9 contributor, please either update the table with your user name and
10 role or send me an email so that I can update it if you don't have
11 access to it.
12
13 > * Bugs:
14 > I have not done the counts, but I see we are actually improving
15 > quite a bit and killing a lot of old and nasty bugs. I think we are
16 > still
17
18 ...lagging on stabilization of our packages (sorry for the incomplete
19 sentence). Stabilization bugs are boring and I wish one of us had time
20 and infrastructure to set up an automated testing framework. Meanwhile,
21 let's stabilize as much as we can the much overdue packages.
22
23 [1] git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sci.git: docs/proj/index.xml
24
25 --
26 Sébastien