| 1 |
On 21/02/10 06:47, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16:51 Thu 21 Jan , Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Johan Hattne |
| 4 |
>> <johan.hattne@××××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Great! Any reference on that? The prefix list (or gentoo-alt, rather) |
| 6 |
>>> has been remarkably silent on the issue, and |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> You can check the council meeting summary of last month where prefix |
| 9 |
>> is approved pending some final actions [1], and this month's meeting |
| 10 |
>> log (the summary should make it to the page any time now) for the |
| 11 |
>> final approval of prefix and the new EAPI3 [2]. You can also emerge |
| 12 |
>> =app-doc/pms-3 where EAPI3 and thus prefix is specified. It's a good |
| 13 |
>> time to start using this and send your comments to the prefix team |
| 14 |
>> about the available documentation. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Denis. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091207-summary.txt |
| 19 |
>> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100118.txt |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Is there some guide around on "Porting ebuilds from EAPI=2 to EAPI=3 for |
| 22 |
> people who don't pay any attention to anything on mailing lists"? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
No there isn't. But for most ebuilds there is no big change to EAPI="2". |
| 26 |
Only exception are ebuilds using the python.eclass [1]. There you likely |
| 27 |
will have a lot of work and the chance is high that you hit a bug in the |
| 28 |
eclass. So I would recommend contacting Arfrever in any case of |
| 29 |
problems. He is really willing to help us. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
app-doc/pms includes the EAPI cheat paper from fauli. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
[1] |
| 34 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~Arfrever/Guide_on_writing_ebuilds_supporting_installation_for_multiple_Python_versions |
Archives