| 1 |
On 23:35 Tue 07 Feb 2012, My Th wrote: |
| 2 |
> O , 2012-02-07 13:13 -0800, Sébastien Fabbro rakstīja: |
| 3 |
> > 2. bugzilla + tag [science overlay] is a hack prone to human mistake |
| 4 |
> > that gives unnecessary work to bugs scanners, whereas a unified |
| 5 |
> > scm+issue system going straight to the dev |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I don't see this as much of a problem. I prefer it as it is now when all |
| 8 |
> bug reports for certain package are in the same tracker instead of two |
| 9 |
> separate ones, depending on whether the particular ebuild has been |
| 10 |
> migrated to the main tree or not. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Just a side remark: I think the idea "Things are in the science overlay |
| 13 |
just until they get migrated to the main tree" is outdated. As far as I |
| 14 |
understand it there are things in the science overlay that are just |
| 15 |
never going to make it to the main tree (binary blobs, precompiled |
| 16 |
library QA desasters, etc. can still be useful software). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cheers, |
| 19 |
Thomas |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> > 3. wiki.g.o is up but not unified to a specific project, I have not |
| 23 |
> > seen a single sci contribution yet |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> They even have dedicated section for Projects&Community, just add there |
| 26 |
> an entry for sci. There is not a single sci contribution only because |
| 27 |
> nobody has cared to write one. That wiki is good and it is the place I |
| 28 |
> would expect to find sci project's wiki if I would search for it. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Reinis |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Thomas Kahle |
| 37 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ |
Archives