| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net>wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
Hi, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> ... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> However, this past week, new final releases of gcl-2.6.8 and gcl-2.6.9 |
| 11 |
> have officilly been made. Does this mean that soon GCL will be unmasked |
| 12 |
> in the portage tree? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Also, if anyone happens to know, what is the reason for releasing both |
| 15 |
> gcl 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 together? Should we just skip 2.6.8 entirely and |
| 16 |
> use 2.6.9, or is there still some virtue with 2.6.8? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Frank Peters |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I could give a try compiling it as you're (and possibly others) interested. |
| 22 |
I think Mr. Grozin (grozin) had done some work previously, maybe he has |
| 23 |
already some ebuilds. I will ask him what he thinks. The lisp team is |
| 24 |
currently understaffed, cannot give you any ETA. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Panagiotis |
| 27 |
(pchrist at gentoo dot org) |
Archives