Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <frp.bissey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-science] suite sparse packages
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:58:16
Message-Id: C1032A0A-8E01-4C2B-8FD2-A68954294F26@slingshot.co.nz
1 Hi all,
2
3 There are a number of bugs about packages that are part of suitesparse
4 in bugzilla. It strikes me that all the versions in portage are rather
5 old. The various packages were last touched by bicatali and he split
6 the main suite sparse tarball into its components and autotooling
7 each one of them. Lots of work.
8 There is another problem with that
9 $ wget https://dev.gentoo.org/~bicatali/distfiles/amd-2.3.1.tar.bz2
10 --2019-03-18 22:46:02-- https://dev.gentoo.org/~bicatali/distfiles/amd-2.3.1.tar.bz2
11 Resolving dev.gentoo.org... 140.211.166.183, 2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4
12 Connecting to dev.gentoo.org|140.211.166.183|:443... connected.
13 HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
14 2019-03-18 22:46:03 ERROR 404: Not Found.
15
16 It’s all gone. Luckily we have the tarball on mirror but the dev-space
17 that is the SRC_URI for the tarball is gone.
18
19 I am volunteering to do some maintenance on those package, starting with
20 updating everything to suitesparse 5.4.0. I have started working on this.
21 But I am realising that if I go the same way as bicatali, I’ll need some
22 dev space myself. I have a resource right now, tied to sage but I don’t
23 know how long it will last. Suggestions welcome.
24
25 My current plan is development in sage-on-gentoo and once it looks OK
26 I’ll want assistance in shepherding a branch with all the ebuilds
27 together in the tree. Hopefully, the next updates won’t be as painful.
28
29 François