Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Peter Bienstman <pbienst@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:53:11
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition by "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky"
On Sunday 21 August 2005 17:33, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I just returned to this list -- what is the "new infrastructure" we are > "preparing for"?
The ability to switch between different lapack implementations (reference, ATLAS, later perhaps MKL) at run time.
> Could we get a "testing/unstable" Atlas in Portage? Right now, they are > at 3.7.10, and I only see a 3.7.10 for blas-atlas, not for atlas itself > or lapack-atlas. I think the x86-64 users will want 3.7.10 across the > board, and might also want to be able to compile selected code with GCC 4.
That's also on the TODO list. Peter


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>