| 1 |
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Frank Hellmuth wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 11 May 2009 13:43:44 François Bissey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi all, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > For anyone interested in using opendx I just pushed a new revision |
| 6 |
> > of it in the overlay along with a new revision of opendx-samples. |
| 7 |
> > [...] |
| 8 |
> > There is still a minor issue to solve properly with szip but I would like |
| 9 |
> > some feedback from the current change by interested users before |
| 10 |
> > going further, I also spent a week perusing opendx code and need a small |
| 11 |
> > break from it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Hi, |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> thanks for your hard work! |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I think there is a problem with parallel make processes. If I try to emerge |
| 18 |
> opendx-4.4.4-r2 with MAKEOPTS="-j3" it fails with |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> [...] |
| 21 |
> Making all in dxmods |
| 22 |
> make[3]: Entering directory |
| 23 |
> `/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/opendx-4.4.4- |
| 24 |
> r2/work/dx-4.4.4/src/exec/dxmods' |
| 25 |
> echo MYINC: |
| 26 |
> rm -f dxcm.mdf |
| 27 |
> MYINC: |
| 28 |
> rm -f dx.mdf |
| 29 |
> cp ./dxmdf.src tmp.c |
| 30 |
> cp ./dxmdf.src tmp.c |
| 31 |
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -E -I../../../include -I./../dpexec - |
| 32 |
> I/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/opendx-4.4.4-r2/work/dx-4.4.4/include - |
| 33 |
> Dlinux -DHAVE_CONFIG_H tmp.c > dxcm.mdf |
| 34 |
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -E -I../../../include -I./../dpexec - |
| 35 |
> I/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/opendx-4.4.4-r2/work/dx-4.4.4/include - |
| 36 |
> Dlinux -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCPLUSPLUS_UI -DEXECUTIVE_MODS tmp.c > dx.mdf |
| 37 |
> rm -f tmp.c |
| 38 |
> cc1: error: tmp.c: No such file or directory |
| 39 |
> make[3]: *** [dx.mdf] Error 1 |
| 40 |
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... |
| 41 |
> [...] |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> With MAKEOPTS="-j1" it compiles and installs fine. |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
Hi Frank, |
| 46 |
we already have a patch for that but for some reason it doesn't always work. |
| 47 |
And I think I know why and I thought I had it solved but obviously it wasn't |
| 48 |
enough. I will see if the solution I think for it works in the next 12 hours. |
| 49 |
For info the patch is concurrent-make-fix and it use to apply to local.mk |
| 50 |
unfortunately this file is meant to be generated from local.mk.in so it can |
| 51 |
be overwritten I changed the patch to local.mk.in but that's obviousvly not |
| 52 |
enough to ensure it is always generated correctly. I will remove the extra |
| 53 |
local.mk that shouldn't be in the tarball in the first place and see if it |
| 54 |
really works without problem. |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Cheers, |
| 57 |
Francois |
Archives