1 |
2012/4/4 Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com>: |
2 |
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:15:41 +0100 |
3 |
> Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 03/15/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Borm wrote: |
6 |
>> > Hi, |
7 |
>> > |
8 |
>> > what are with users that only have write access to the original overlay? |
9 |
>> > Do they need a github account in order to further contribute to the sci |
10 |
>> > overlay? |
11 |
>> It's not mandatory so they don't need to, though I've strongly encourage |
12 |
>> to do so. |
13 |
>> > What will happen if they push their changes just to g.o.g ? |
14 |
>> When a person with access to both repos does git pull --all, it pull |
15 |
>> changes from both, and during push --all it will be naturally migrated |
16 |
>> to github. Of course it also works the other way around. As far as my |
17 |
>> short experience with that workflow goes it's almost indistinguishable |
18 |
>> to what we had so far. Only pull/push time is slightly longer |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It might be worth adding a "stable" branch to the |
21 |
> repository. Goal there is that changes to into the |
22 |
> trunk and ones found to work or that pass more tests |
23 |
> can get selectively merged into the stable branch. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Makes it easeir to catch minor bugs after a commit. |
26 |
IMO, stable stuff should go in the default portage tree (gx86). I am |
27 |
against having too many layers of "stable". |
28 |
|
29 |
Christoph |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> Steven Lembark 3646 Flora Pl |
35 |
> Workhorse Computing St Louis, MO 63110 |
36 |
> lembark@×××××××.com +1 888 359 3508 |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Christoph Junghans |
43 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/ |