Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Github repo is Live & Kicking
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:03:10
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] Github repo is Live & Kicking by Steven Lembark
2012/4/4 Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com>:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:15:41 +0100 > Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o> wrote: > >> On 03/15/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Borm wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > what are with users that only have write access to the original overlay? >> > Do they need a github account in order to further contribute to the sci >> > overlay? >> It's not mandatory so they don't need to, though I've strongly encourage >> to do so. >> > What will happen if they push their changes just to g.o.g ? >> When a person with access to both repos does git pull --all, it pull >> changes from both, and during push --all it will be naturally migrated >> to github. Of course it also works the other way around. As far as my >> short experience with that workflow goes it's almost indistinguishable >> to what we had so far. Only pull/push time is slightly longer > > It might be worth adding a "stable" branch to the > repository. Goal there is that changes to into the > trunk and ones found to work or that pass more tests > can get selectively merged into the stable branch. > > Makes it easeir to catch minor bugs after a commit.
IMO, stable stuff should go in the default portage tree (gx86). I am against having too many layers of "stable". Christoph
> > > -- > Steven Lembark                                             3646 Flora Pl > Workhorse Computing                                   St Louis, MO 63110 > lembark@×××××××.com                                      +1 888 359 3508 >
-- Christoph Junghans


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] Github repo is Live & Kicking My Th <rei4dan@×××××.com>