| 1 |
I don't think you can run an mpich compiled executable with lam. I think |
| 2 |
one possible way would be to create your own ebuild file (copy of the |
| 3 |
mpich ebuild) and change the dependencies there. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Glenn Johnson wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
>Is there a way to use lam-mpi for a program (closed source) compiled |
| 8 |
>against mpich? If that is possible then that would be an option. I |
| 9 |
>have never had to have X installed for mpich before. It looks like |
| 10 |
>something that went into the most recent two e-builds. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>On 11/16/05, Philippe Trottier <tchiwam@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>>Glenn Johnson wrote: |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>>>I am trying to upgrade mpich to version 1.2.7_p1 and it wants to |
| 19 |
>>>install xorg and friends. I do not want X11 and have never had it |
| 20 |
>>>installed in the past. Does mpich really need xorg? If not, then how |
| 21 |
>>>can I tell portage about it? |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>>Thanks. |
| 24 |
>>>-- |
| 25 |
>>>Glenn Johnson |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>I have stooped using mpich and started use lam-mpi take a look at that ? |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>>I have never tried mpich without X so I cannot say much more. |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>>Phil |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>>-- |
| 37 |
>>gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
>-- |
| 45 |
>Glenn Johnson |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
Archives