1 |
I've been spending the majority of my Gentoo-related time working on a |
2 |
solution to bug 44132 [1], basically, trying to find a way to gracefully |
3 |
handle multiple installs of various MPI implementations at the same time in |
4 |
Gentoo. Theres more information about the solution in my devspace [2], but |
5 |
a quick summary is that there is a new package (empi) that is much like |
6 |
crossdev, a new eselect module for empi, and a new eclass that handles both |
7 |
mpi implementations and packages depending on mpi. |
8 |
|
9 |
So, I think I have pushed this work far enough along for it to actually be |
10 |
somewhat officially offered. My question then, is where should this be |
11 |
located? There are several mpi packages in the science overlay already, so |
12 |
should I push this work to there, or would it be more appropriate to make a |
13 |
new overlay specifically for hp-cluster? |
14 |
|
15 |
Future work related to this project will be getting all mpi implementations |
16 |
and dependant packages converted in the same overlay before bringing it up on |
17 |
-dev for discussion about inclusion into the main tree. |
18 |
|
19 |
I have no real preference either way, but the science team does already have |
20 |
an overlay :) Let me know what you think. |
21 |
|
22 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44132 |
23 |
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~jsbronder/README.empi.txt |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Justin Bronder |