Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-science] Empi, should it be in the science overlay?
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:48:44
Message-Id: 20080226154538.GC3622@mejis.cold-front
1 I've been spending the majority of my Gentoo-related time working on a
2 solution to bug 44132 [1], basically, trying to find a way to gracefully
3 handle multiple installs of various MPI implementations at the same time in
4 Gentoo. Theres more information about the solution in my devspace [2], but
5 a quick summary is that there is a new package (empi) that is much like
6 crossdev, a new eselect module for empi, and a new eclass that handles both
7 mpi implementations and packages depending on mpi.
8
9 So, I think I have pushed this work far enough along for it to actually be
10 somewhat officially offered. My question then, is where should this be
11 located? There are several mpi packages in the science overlay already, so
12 should I push this work to there, or would it be more appropriate to make a
13 new overlay specifically for hp-cluster?
14
15 Future work related to this project will be getting all mpi implementations
16 and dependant packages converted in the same overlay before bringing it up on
17 -dev for discussion about inclusion into the main tree.
18
19 I have no real preference either way, but the science team does already have
20 an overlay :) Let me know what you think.
21
22 [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44132
23 [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~jsbronder/README.empi.txt
24
25 --
26 Justin Bronder

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] Empi, should it be in the science overlay? Alexey Shvetsov <alexxyum@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-science] Empi, should it be in the science overlay? Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
[gentoo-science] Re: Empi, should it be in the science overlay? Justin Bronder <jsbronder@g.o>
[gentoo-science] Re: Empi, should it be in the science overlay? Radice David <david.e.pi.3.14@×××××.com>