1 |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>> it is masked. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> ... and that is irrelavant from a dev perspective. People report bugs |
5 |
> and we have to come up with solutions. The mask just makes the problem |
6 |
> less urgent. |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
we do not have to come up with solutions for glpk api breaks. i could |
10 |
have simply not bump glpk in the tree and there will be no bugs. |
11 |
masking or subslot dependencies is what we can do without diving into |
12 |
upstream code. obviously patches are welcome. |