| 1 |
On 06/24/2013 11:25 PM, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:19 PM, <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I personally think glpk 4.50 should be masked until we have some resolution |
| 6 |
>> on |
| 7 |
>> all these. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> it is masked. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
... and that is irrelavant from a dev perspective. People report bugs |
| 13 |
and we have to come up with solutions. The mask just makes the problem |
| 14 |
less urgent. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Knowing 4ti2's upstream I doubt that there ever will be a patch for |
| 17 |
4ti2. Nobody touches that part of the code and nobody does maintenance |
| 18 |
anyway. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Thomas Kahle |
Archives