1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Thu, 15 May 2008 18:24:35 +0700 (NOVST)
|
5 |
"Andrey G. Grozin" <A.G.Grozin@×××××××.su> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> I propose *not* to use an external liborigin in qtiplot. Am I right
|
8 |
> that liborigin is used only by qtiplot? Then it would be better to |
9 |
> get rid of sci-libs/liborigin at all. It seems veru unlikely that |
10 |
> anybody else (except qtiplot) will want it. And qtiplot always |
11 |
> contains its own, newest and customized source of liborigin. If a |
12 |
> uswer cares for Origin compatibility, he will be better off with this |
13 |
> version. |
14 |
|
15 |
At least sci-visualization/labplot uses liborigin, and someone could
|
16 |
want to use liborigin for its own use.
|
17 |
Internal copies are harmful and best avoided. The best solution is
|
18 |
ususally to work out with upstream to try to remove it.
|
19 |
|
20 |
- --
|
21 |
Sébastien
|
22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
|
24 |
|
25 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkgut8MACgkQ1ycZbhPLE2CCDgCeKs2l0RMuSg8xlhni3hZatNGY
|
26 |
YikAmwSEitdIs7wcp/w2X4sfxTdTYX4B
|
27 |
=9Hrr
|
28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |