Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] anyone on the list with ppc hardware?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:19:13
Message-Id: 201003191518.37433.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] anyone on the list with ppc hardware? by Francesco Biscani
1 > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:51 AM, François Bissey
2 >
3 > <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz> wrote:
4 > > Hi all,
5 > >
6 > > I have been trying to get ecls running on my ppc box but the build fails.
7 > > It is somewhat sage-on-gentoo related as I would prefer to build maxima
8 > > with ecls as used in standard sage.
9 > > See bug #308909 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308909).
10 > >
11 > > I have been looking at it for a while and I don't I have a clue.
12 > > The fact that the build goes further with gcc-4.3.4 than gcc-4.4.3 seems
13 > > to point the finger to a gcc problem on ppc but I am not sure.
14 > >
15 > > So is there anyone else with ppc hardware that could test this?
16 > >
17 > > Francois
18 >
19 > Hi Francois,
20 >
21 > It might be a long shot, but try to remove the mtune/march and play
22 > around a bit with the optimisation flag.
23 >
24 Kind of a good call. For some reasons with ppc I have to add -std=c99
25 to my CFLAGS if I compile with gcc-4.4.3 - note that it is not necessary
26 with gcc-4.3.4 on ppc or gcc-4.4.3 on x86. Just adding that got me to
27 a further failure to lisp bootstrapping (that I had with gcc-4.3.4).
28
29 Removing all other flags however seems to have done the trick, so there
30 may be one that is dodgy to ecls in the lot.
31 I will see if building has finished later, cross finger :)
32 If it does I may take some time to see which flag(s) lead to the failure.
33 In the meantime I also asked for help from the ppc forum.
34
35 Francois

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] anyone on the list with ppc hardware? Francesco Biscani <bluescarni@×××××.com>