Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <frp.bissey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] ntl bump
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:54:56
Message-Id: A6BAECEB-3B94-44E6-A272-58ECC73ABAA3@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] ntl bump by Thomas Kahle
1 And Victor just announce ntl 9.0 on sage-devel:
2
3 With much trepidation, I have introduced a (hopefully minor)
4 backward incompatibility into NTL.
5
6 The interface to the single-precision modular arithmetic
7 routines has been modified slightly.
8 This interface change allows for more flexible and more
9 efficient implementation of these routines,
10 which play a crucial role at many levels in NTL.
11
12 Basically, these changes to the interface abstract away
13 some implementation details that arguably should never been there
14 in the first place.
15 By coding to the new interface, NTL clients will be able to
16 benefit from the current and future improvements.
17
18 In particular, on 64-bit x86/GCC platforms, single precision
19 moduli can now be up to 60 bits, rather than 50 bits.
20 While some operations may in fact be a little slower, the most important
21 ones (like MulModPrecon) should not be.
22 Using larger moduli speeds up a number of things, like ZZ_pX
23 arithmetic, as fewer primes need to be used in Chinese Remaindering steps.
24 Other applications benefit from larger moduli as well.
25
26 It is expected that most NTL clients will not be affected at all.
27 Moreover, any code that needs to be updated will be detected
28 by the compiler, and the updates should be simple and mechanical.
29 There is also a configuration flag that will enable the legacy
30 interface (although this is not recommended practice).
31
32 For more, go to http://www.shoup.net/ntl

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] ntl bump Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-science] ntl bump Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>