1 |
Here is the upstream thread for gory details but your set up is supposed |
2 |
to be enough, if it isn't we are doing something that a rather nasty impact. |
3 |
|
4 |
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/Ww3xPekUHns |
5 |
|
6 |
Francois |
7 |
|
8 |
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:51:13 François Bissey wrote: |
9 |
> According to upstream it all should be enough (there was a thread not so |
10 |
> long ago on sage-devel I am sure). |
11 |
> We must be doing something slightly differently. In any case, while it is |
12 |
> nice to have it building most people probably prefer the binary version. We |
13 |
> only started to use it for normal release because that official binaries |
14 |
> for the doc was so late we couldn’t release stable ebuilds for sage 6.2. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I will see what we could do. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> François |
19 |
> |
20 |
> On 23/09/2014, at 19:51, v_2e@×××.net wrote: |
21 |
> > Hello! |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:52:41 +1200 |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote: |
26 |
> >> Hi Vladimir, |
27 |
> >> |
28 |
> >> Can you tell me: How many threads you are using (-j??) |
29 |
> >> and whether you have swap enabled on that machine. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > I usually use a single thread in make.conf (-j1). I also have a 1 GB of |
32 |
> > swap space enabled. |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > Vladimir |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > ----- |
37 |
> > <v_2e@×××.net> |