| 1 |
François Bissey wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We have virtuals for blas, cblas and lapack. At the moment there is only |
| 5 |
> one package with a clapack implementation in the tree and one in the |
| 6 |
> science overlay. These two are the only one I could find with a quick search. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> With the sage development there is at least one package that depends |
| 9 |
> on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Francois |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Just find out whether there more packages which can provide an equal |
| 15 |
implementation for clapack. If so a virtual package would make sense, |
| 16 |
but only then. |
Archives