Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <frp.bissey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack 3.6.0 harmful for scipy
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 01:09:19
Message-Id: 565CF335.6070308@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] lapack 3.6.0 harmful for scipy by "François Bissey"
1 upstream scipy PR for 0.17:
2 https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/5518
3
4 On 12/01/15 13:56, François Bissey wrote:
5 > So lapack 3.6.0 landed while I wasn't looking.
6 > scipy (0.16.1) doesn't like it:
7 > ldd -r /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/scipy/linalg/_flapack.so
8 > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff84da2000)
9 > libopenblas_threads.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libopenblas_threads.so.0
10 > (0x00007f5ac2513000)
11 > libreflapack.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libreflapack.so.3
12 > (0x00007f5ac1d4d000)
13 > libpython2.7.so.1.0 => /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
14 > (0x00007f5ac198e000)
15 > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f5ac15f3000)
16 > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f5ac12ee000)
17 > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f5ac10d2000)
18 > libgfortran.so.3 =>
19 > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/libgfortran.so.3
20 > (0x00007f5ac0daa000)
21 > libgcc_s.so.1 =>
22 > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f5ac0b92000)
23 > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f5ac098e000)
24 > libutil.so.1 => /lib64/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f5ac078b000)
25 > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f5ac2da9000)
26 > libquadmath.so.0 =>
27 > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/libquadmath.so.0
28 > (0x00007f5ac054c000)
29 > undefined symbol: sgegv_
30 > (/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/scipy/linalg/_flapack.so)
31 > undefined symbol: dgegv_
32 > (/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/scipy/linalg/_flapack.so)
33 > undefined symbol: cgegv_
34 > (/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/scipy/linalg/_flapack.so)
35 > undefined symbol: zgegv_
36 > (/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/scipy/linalg/_flapack.so)
37 >
38 > There may be other. Those functions have been deprecated for a while
39 > apparently and now they have been removed.
40 > My first thought was it should mean a soname change for lapack but
41 > I am not sure how long it's been deprecated. I haven't found an upstream
42 > bug in scipy yet, but we will need a patch quickly unless lapack is masked.
43 >
44 > Francois
45 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] lapack 3.6.0 harmful for scipy "Justin Lecher (jlec)" <jlec@g.o>