1 |
Quoting Sébastien Fabbro <bicatali@g.o>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> We are contemplating the idea of switching the official science overlay |
6 |
> to an external repository such as github. Here are some of the |
7 |
> advantages we would like to |
8 |
> get: |
9 |
> 1. easier to contribute |
10 |
> 2. specific issue tracker |
11 |
> 3. wiki |
12 |
> |
13 |
Other people have made useful comments already. The only point that I think |
14 |
is interesting about github is the possibility to clone the overlay and have |
15 |
pull requests. |
16 |
Effectively that means people can contribute without ever getting infra |
17 |
involved and an external contributor can send a pull request even if they are |
18 |
not a member of the github science team. |
19 |
|
20 |
Francois |