| 1 |
> On 18/10/2016, at 09:35, Steven Trogdon <strogdon@×××××.edu> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:11:59 +1300 |
| 4 |
> François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On 18/10/16 06:10, v_2e@×××.net wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> Hello! |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:55:18 +1300 |
| 10 |
>>> François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> OK so I checked on my other machine. liblinbox.so should have been |
| 13 |
>>>> linked to (c)blas and so should have matrix_modn_dense_float.so |
| 14 |
>>>> independently. Because you didn’t get any complaints from ldd |
| 15 |
>>>> on liblinbox.so I’ll assume that it was missing/not properly |
| 16 |
>>>> detected when linbox was built. The way matrix_modn_dense_float.so |
| 17 |
>>>> is built also suggest that cblas was missing when built. |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> What does |
| 20 |
>>>> pkg-config —libs cblas |
| 21 |
>>>> pkg-config —libs blas |
| 22 |
>>>> pkg-config —libs lapack |
| 23 |
>>>> report? |
| 24 |
>>>> |
| 25 |
>>> $ pkg-config --libs cblas |
| 26 |
>>> -lgsl |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>> $ pkg-config --libs blas |
| 29 |
>>> -lblas |
| 30 |
>>> |
| 31 |
>>> $ pkg-config --libs lapack |
| 32 |
>>> -lreflapack -lblas |
| 33 |
>>> |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> Smells like a system using the main tree blas/lapack rather |
| 36 |
>> than the science overlay. I may have to enforce something |
| 37 |
>> there. Anyway those are very strange answers nonetheless. |
| 38 |
>> I would expect "-lgslcblas" not "-lgsl". If you have |
| 39 |
>> "-lreflapack" what blas are you using if not "refblas"? |
| 40 |
>> So does /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so exist on your system? |
| 41 |
>> Is /usr/lib64/libblas.so a dangling symlink (point to nothing)? |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
>> Francois |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> OK, the blas does appear to be perhaps dangling, but the the cblas looks like |
| 48 |
> what was reported at https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/429. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Good point Steve! I had forgotten about that. And since no one seems |
| 51 |
to care about https://github.com/gentoo-science/sci/pull/638 |
| 52 |
It is likely to stay that way unless I include it in the sage-on-gentoo |
| 53 |
overlay. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Remember folks, gsl from the science overlay is broken. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
François |
Archives