| 1 |
I don’t think your situation is possible without mixing stuff |
| 2 |
from the main tree (blas) and the science overlay. I didn’t even |
| 3 |
realise you could mix, but I don’t think that is sane. |
| 4 |
gsl from the science overlay is unfortunately not in a good shape |
| 5 |
and I don’t recommend to use it as cblas. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Unless there are particular reasons for not doing so, I would recommend |
| 8 |
that you use openblas from the science overlay for both blas and cblas. |
| 9 |
The following useflags for openblas are sane: |
| 10 |
“int64 threads -openmp” |
| 11 |
You’ll want to re-emerge lapack-reference once openblas is eselected. |
| 12 |
For sanity. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
François |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> On 18/10/2016, at 20:43, v_2e@×××.net wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:11:59 +1300 |
| 19 |
> François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>> ... If you have |
| 22 |
>> "-lreflapack" what blas are you using if not "refblas"? |
| 23 |
>> So does /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so exist on your system? |
| 24 |
>> Is /usr/lib64/libblas.so a dangling symlink (point to nothing)? |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> Here is the output: |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> $ eselect blas list |
| 29 |
> Available providers for blas: |
| 30 |
> [1] reference * |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so |
| 33 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 бер 28 2016 /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so -> libgslcblas.so.0.0.0 |
| 34 |
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0 |
| 35 |
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 251720 бер 28 2016 /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0 |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libblas.so |
| 38 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 гру 15 2015 /usr/lib64/libblas.so -> libblas.so.3 |
| 39 |
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 |
| 40 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 гру 15 2015 /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 -> libblas.so.3.6.0 |
| 41 |
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3.6.0 |
| 42 |
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 362384 гру 15 2015 /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3.6.0 |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> So both files do exist. |
| 46 |
> As of the GSL, it looks like on my system it is installed from 'science' overlay: |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> $ emerge -vp gsl |
| 49 |
> [ebuild R ] sci-libs/gsl-2.1:0/19::science USE="-cblas-external -int64 -static-libs" ABI_X86="(64) -32" 0 KiB |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Should I install the GSL from the main Portage tree instead? |
| 52 |
> Vladimir |
| 53 |
> ----- |
| 54 |
> <v_2e@×××.net> |
| 55 |
> |
Archives