| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 09/03/2014 11:22 AM, François Bissey wrote:> Do you have a list, for |
| 4 |
people interested? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
list of packages with SRC_URI failure problems is attached. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
List of packages with repoman problem can be obtained by running |
| 10 |
`repoman full -d` (c) Captain Obvious |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I can not create list of packages with really hard problems as this |
| 13 |
needs more work, that is in progress now. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
What I'm planning to do is: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- try to fix repoman failures |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- try to do version bump for packages with repoman failures/SRC_URI failures |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- if this does not help, mask the package, or remove bad versions, if a |
| 22 |
package has other, working, versions |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I think this will not hurt people interested in a given package. I will |
| 25 |
describe in mask comment what exact problems I had, so it would be |
| 26 |
easier for those interested to fix it. I think it is the sanest way to |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- silence repoman, so new PR can be tested automatically |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- make sure that stuff from our overlay is working |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
- signal to ones interested in a given package, that there is something |
| 33 |
bad with it and it should be fixed |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Regards, |
| 36 |
Jauhien |
Archives