Re: [gentoo-science] emerge failed

[Justin]

Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> On 19:18 Mon 17 Dec     , Justin wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>> I tried to emerge coot-0.3.3 with new-interface which failed
>> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202599). Now I recognised that
>> at my office computer, which is basically of the same software setup,
>> coot emerged with the 1.99 version of gtkglarea.
>> My question now is, how can I easily compare the systems (Useflags used,
>> packages emerged...) to figure out the difference.
>>
>
> You can install portage-utils and run `qlist -I -U -v packagename` to
> show the versions and USE flags of various packages. Relevant ones would
> probably be coot, gtkglarea, maybe gtkglext. I'm not really sure why it
> would even be looking for gtkglarea with new-interface on, though, since
> that should only be for the old gtk-1 interface.
>
> Since that bug shows that a header wasn't found at
> /usr/include/gtkgl/gtkglarea.h, it might be worth checking whether that
> file exists.
>
This file belongs to x11-libs/gtkglarea-1.2.3-r1. So this package must
be emerged for coot.
> I've got some newer ebuilds around for 0.4 prereleases that I could add
> to the tree masked, if that would help.
>
I thought for myself writing an ebuild for that, but I didn't found the
sources. But I will be a happy tester if you need. The same, if you need
help maintaining packages, i offer my help. The science thing should
enlarge in gentoo. I wrote a couple of ebuild for my private-overlay,
which work fine for me. Perhaps there is some need for that. Some
packages are Arpwarp, xds, cara, and i'm working on phaser or rewriting
the ccp4 ebuild so that it could emerge phaser as a dep. The only thing
which im not sure about is the legal thing with those ebuilds. So if you
could teach me which license the writing of ebuild alows and which, I
publish them.

Thanks justin

> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
-- 
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list