Re: [gentoo-science] help with pari testsuite

[Steven Trogdon]

For me the tests pass on both Gentoo and Prefix:

Gentoo:
>>> Source compiled.
>>> Test phase: sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2
make -j5 dobench
Making dobench in Olinux-x86_64
make[1]: Entering directory
'/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64'
* Testing objets           gp-dyn..TIME=    1
* Testing analyz           gp-dyn..TIME=   11
* Testing number           gp-dyn..TIME=   11
* Testing polyser          gp-dyn..TIME=    4
* Testing linear           gp-dyn..TIME=    5
* Testing elliptic         gp-dyn..TIME=   16
* Testing sumiter          gp-dyn..TIME=    5
* Testing graph            gp-dyn..TIME=    4
* Testing program          gp-dyn..TIME=    3
* Testing trans            gp-dyn..TIME=   13
* Testing nfields          gp-dyn..TIME=   52
+++ Total bench for gp-dyn is 83

Prefix:
>>> Source compiled.
>>> Test phase: sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2
make -j13 dobench
Making dobench in Olinux-x86_64
make[1]: Entering directory
'/storage/strogdon/gentoo-rap/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64'
* Testing objets           gp-dyn..TIME=    0
* Testing analyz           gp-dyn..TIME=   12
* Testing number           gp-dyn..TIME=    8
* Testing polyser          gp-dyn..TIME=    4
* Testing linear           gp-dyn..TIME=    4
* Testing elliptic         gp-dyn..TIME=   16
* Testing sumiter          gp-dyn..TIME=    4
* Testing graph            gp-dyn..TIME=    0
* Testing program          gp-dyn..TIME=    4
* Testing trans            gp-dyn..TIME=   12
* Testing nfields          gp-dyn..TIME=   44
+++ Total bench for gp-dyn is 72

The testing is done under /var/tmp and $EPREFIX/var/tmp

Steve

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:14 PM François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For several years now I have keeping pari up to date in the
> sage-on-gentoo overlay, even getting upstream snapshots as
> needed for sage. For a while my stable ebuilds have been picked
> up for the main tree by a kind soul.
>
> For several years now I haven't been able to successfully run
> any of pari testsuite from portage. And it seems to be something
> in the portage environment. I have now decided to seek some help
> on the issue as I have run out of things I can think of a long
> time ago.
>
> So if I run "ebuild pari-2.11.2.ebuild test" (valid with all older
> ebuilds available) I get
>  >>> Source compiled.
>  >>> Test phase: sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2
> make -j8 dobench
> Making dobench in Olinux-x86_64
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64'
> * Testing objets           gp-dyn..TIME=    1
> * Testing analyz           gp-dyn..TIME=    3
> * Testing number           gp-dyn..BUG [10]
> * Testing polyser          gp-dyn..BUG [3]
> * Testing linear           gp-dyn..BUG [0]
> * Testing elliptic         gp-dyn..BUG [14]
> * Testing sumiter          gp-dyn..TIME=    5
> * Testing graph            gp-dyn..TIME=    3
> * Testing program          gp-dyn..TIME=    0
> * Testing trans            gp-dyn..TIME=   11
> * Testing nfields          gp-dyn..BUG [38]
> +++ [BUG] Total bench for gp-dyn is 57
>
> PROBLEMS WERE NOTED. The following files list them in diff format:
> Directory:
> /dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64
>          number-dyn.dif
>          polyser-dyn.dif
>          linear-dyn.dif
>          elliptic-dyn.dif
>          nfields-dyn.dif
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:344: dobench] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64'
> make: *** [Makefile:34: dobench] Error 2
>   * ERROR: sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2::sage-on-gentoo failed (test phase):
>   *   emake failed
>   *
>   * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info
> '=sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2::sage-on-gentoo'`,
>   * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv
> '=sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2::sage-on-gentoo'`.
>   * The complete build log is located at
> '/var/log/portage/build/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2:20190718-215929.log'.
>   * For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/temp/build.log'.
>   * The ebuild environment file is located at
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/temp/environment'.
>   * Working directory:
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2'
>   * S: '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2'
> fbissey@moonloop ~/Work/Overlays/sage-on-gentoo/sci-mathematics/pari $
> cd /dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2
> fbissey@moonloop
> /dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2 $ make -j8
> dobench
> Making dobench in Olinux-x86_64
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64'
> * Testing objets           gp-dyn..TIME=    0
> * Testing analyz           gp-dyn..TIME=    0
> * Testing number           gp-dyn..TIME=    1
> * Testing polyser          gp-dyn..TIME=    3
> * Testing linear           gp-dyn..TIME=    0
> * Testing elliptic         gp-dyn..TIME=   14
> * Testing sumiter          gp-dyn..TIME=    5
> * Testing graph            gp-dyn..TIME=    3
> * Testing program          gp-dyn..TIME=    3
> * Testing trans            gp-dyn..TIME=   11
> * Testing nfields          gp-dyn..TIME=   42
> +++ Total bench for gp-dyn is 48
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/dev/shm/portage/sci-mathematics/pari-2.11.2/work/pari-2.11.2/Olinux-x86_64'
>
> That's right the tests fails in the ebuild but pass when I run the same
> command manually/ It is not a fluke due to running the tests twice.
> If I do "ebuild ... compile" and then run the tests manually, they will
> succeed.
>
> When I look at the diff produced by the test suite I gat stuff like
> *** ../src/test/32/number       2018-07-26 06:00:21.000000000 +1200
> --- gp.out      2019-07-19 10:11:20.505605285 +1200
> ***************
> *** 60,70 ****
>
>    ? factor(100!+1,0)
>
> ! [101 1]
>
> ! [14303 1]
>
> ! [149239 1]
>
>
> [432885273849892962613071800918658949059679308685024481795740765527568493010
>
> 727023757461397498800981521440877813288657839195622497225621499427628453 1]
> --- 60,73 ----
>
>    ? factor(100!+1,0)
>
> ! [
>
> !
> 101 1]
>
> ! [
>
> !
> 14303 1]
>
> ! [
>
> !
> 149239 1]
>
>
> [432885273849892962613071800918658949059679308685024481795740765527568493010
>
> 727023757461397498800981521440877813288657839195622497225621499427628453 1]
>
> The only difference is a widely different formatting of the output when
> run under the portage environment.
>
> Does anyone have a clue as to how this is possible? What could cause it
> and more importantly, how to fix it.
>
> Cheers,
> François
>