Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Johan Hattne <johan.hattne@××××××××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:17:01
Message-Id: 4B58D24C.3020701@utsouthwestern.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless by Denis Dupeyron
1 On 01/21/10 15:53, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
2 > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> wrote:
3 >> On 21/01/10 20:35, Johan Hattne wrote:
4 >>> While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is
5 >>> anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept
6 >>> patches to that end?
7 >> Same to me, I have a prefixed science package git overlay. Currently
8 >> only nmr stuff, but I am also porting xray packages. Drop the patches to me.
9 >
10 > Talking about this, prefix was officially approved with eapi3 (not the
11 > original eapi3 now called eapi4) a few days ago. So feel free to push
12 > all your prefix stuff to the official tree whenever you feel like it,
13 > or to harass a dev to push it for you.
14
15 Great! Any reference on that? The prefix list (or gentoo-alt, rather)
16 has been remarkably silent on the issue, and
17
18 // Cheers; Johan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] sci-chemistry/pointless Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>