Archives
Archives
| From: | "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack |
| Date: | Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:53:36 |
| Message-Id: | 200912062153.03673.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz |
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | We have virtuals for blas, cblas and lapack. At the moment there is only |
| 4 | one package with a clapack implementation in the tree and one in the |
| 5 | science overlay. These two are the only one I could find with a quick search. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | With the sage development there is at least one package that depends |
| 8 | on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Francois |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack | Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack | "Sébastien Fabbro" <bicatali@g.o> |