1 |
On 06/30/2010 10:51 AM, François Bissey wrote: |
2 |
>> Hi, |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> The way that sage depends on lapack and numpy is broken at the moment. |
5 |
>> Can somebody look at bug 320669 ? |
6 |
>> At least here on x86 it is not possible to get a working sage at the |
7 |
>> moment. Let me know if there is anything I can test or do. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> this is a bit more subtle than that Thomas. I have 2 x86 machines, |
10 |
> one with problems and one without. Christopher doesn't have problems |
11 |
> on his x86 machine either. |
12 |
> Why is this bug not affecting amd64? |
13 |
|
14 |
Now I'm curious about lapack and friends. It seems that atlas is the |
15 |
current way to go for sage, but I found that in various places |
16 |
"reference" is eselected on my system. |
17 |
Can somebody with a working system post a list of which implementations |
18 |
should be eselected for which package? |
19 |
Maybe someone should update this here too: |
20 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/blas-lapack.xml |
21 |
|
22 |
Thomas |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
> |
26 |
> Francois |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Thomas Kahle |