Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Thomas Kahle <tom111@×××.de>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sage -> numpy -> lapack
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:21:40
Message-Id: 4C2B0C86.1020301@gmx.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] sage -> numpy -> lapack by "François Bissey"
1 On 06/30/2010 10:51 AM, François Bissey wrote:
2 >> Hi,
3 >>
4 >> The way that sage depends on lapack and numpy is broken at the moment.
5 >> Can somebody look at bug 320669 ?
6 >> At least here on x86 it is not possible to get a working sage at the
7 >> moment. Let me know if there is anything I can test or do.
8 >>
9 > this is a bit more subtle than that Thomas. I have 2 x86 machines,
10 > one with problems and one without. Christopher doesn't have problems
11 > on his x86 machine either.
12 > Why is this bug not affecting amd64?
13
14 Now I'm curious about lapack and friends. It seems that atlas is the
15 current way to go for sage, but I found that in various places
16 "reference" is eselected on my system.
17 Can somebody with a working system post a list of which implementations
18 should be eselected for which package?
19 Maybe someone should update this here too:
20 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/blas-lapack.xml
21
22 Thomas
23
24
25 >
26 > Francois
27
28
29 --
30 Thomas Kahle

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] sage -> numpy -> lapack "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz>