| 1 |
> On 06/30/2010 10:47 AM, bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote: |
| 2 |
> > ------- Comment #6 from f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz 2010-06-30 08:47 0000 |
| 3 |
> > ------- that could explain a lot of things since I suffer from a broken |
| 4 |
> > atlas as well. I will try switching to a working lapack and see what |
| 5 |
> > happens. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> By the way, do we (does sage) really need this atlas implementation, or |
| 8 |
> would reference work in principle? This self-tuning business makes me |
| 9 |
> shiver. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
sage itself would probably be fine with reference I think. However linbox |
| 12 |
and historically ghmm (now gone) need clapack which is provided by |
| 13 |
lapack-atlas. Actually _you can_ build lapack-atlas using blas-reference |
| 14 |
not very efficient but doable. |
| 15 |
For the rest I need to check if linbox is linked in sage - if it is then you |
| 16 |
run the risk of linking with multiple versions of lapack. Which actually given |
| 17 |
how sage is built may not be such a big problem. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Francois |
Archives