| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> GCC 4.1 will be unmasked this week. A major consequence for scientific |
| 5 |
> users is the switch from g77 to gfortran. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I've run a quick grep to see what packages clearly won't work. The |
| 8 |
command, which only checks for packages in sci-* and dev-*: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
grep -r -e 'FORTRAN=.*g77' -e 'need_fortran.*g77' sci-* dev-* |
| 11 |
--include='*.ebuild' | grep -v gfort |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Here's the results, with ebuilds pulled from the list if a newer version |
| 14 |
supports gfortran. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'll look at ortep3, platon, tinker, *-reference, pgplot. That just |
| 17 |
leaves scipy, which already has |
| 18 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134248 open for it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
sci-chemistry/ortep3/ortep3-1.0.3.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 21 |
sci-chemistry/platon/platon-20051215.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 22 |
sci-chemistry/tinker/tinker-4.2.ebuild:FORTRAN="ifc g77" |
| 23 |
sci-libs/blas-reference/blas-reference-19940131-r2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 |
| 24 |
ifc" || FORTRAN="g77 f2c ifc" # No f2c on 64-bit systems yet :-/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This line ^^^ looks distinctly weird and I don't understand how it would |
| 27 |
ever work as desired. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
sci-libs/blas/blas-19980702.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 30 |
sci-libs/blas/blas-19980702-r1.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 31 |
sci-libs/blas/blas-19980702-r2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 32 |
sci-libs/scipy/scipy-0.4.8-r1.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 33 |
sci-libs/scipy/scipy-0.4.8.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
| 34 |
sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r1.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 ifc" |
| 35 |
sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 ifc" |
| 36 |
sci-libs/pgplot/pgplot-5.2.2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
Archives