| 1 |
According to upstream it all should be enough (there was a thread not so long ago |
| 2 |
on sage-devel I am sure). |
| 3 |
We must be doing something slightly differently. In any case, while it is nice |
| 4 |
to have it building most people probably prefer the binary version. We only |
| 5 |
started to use it for normal release because that official binaries for the doc |
| 6 |
was so late we couldn’t release stable ebuilds for sage 6.2. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I will see what we could do. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
François |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On 23/09/2014, at 19:51, v_2e@×××.net wrote: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Hello! |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:52:41 +1200 |
| 17 |
> François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>> Hi Vladimir, |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> Can you tell me: How many threads you are using (-j??) |
| 22 |
>> and whether you have swap enabled on that machine. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> I usually use a single thread in make.conf (-j1). I also have a 1 GB of |
| 25 |
> swap space enabled. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Vladimir |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> ----- |
| 30 |
> <v_2e@×××.net> |
| 31 |
> |
Archives