1 |
On 10:32 Tue 07 Feb 2012, fbissey@××××××××××××.nz wrote: |
2 |
> > I've run the attached script to find duplicates of packages from |
3 |
> > sage-on-gentoo in science. The output was: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > $ ./find-overlay-dups.sh |
6 |
> > sci-chemistry/jmol |
7 |
> > sci-libs/fplll |
8 |
> > sci-libs/givaro |
9 |
> > sci-libs/iml |
10 |
> > sci-libs/m4ri |
11 |
> > sci-libs/symmetrica |
12 |
> > sci-mathematics/gap |
13 |
> > sci-mathematics/polybori |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > What do people think about merging those versions in the science overlay |
17 |
> > and removing them from sage-on-gentoo (or vice-versa)? Probably in most |
18 |
> > cases there are additional fixes in sage-on-gentoo that science users |
19 |
> > could benefit from (or at least should hurt nobody)? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Since Christopher and I have access to the science overlay we should |
22 |
> do some clean up and synchronization. |
23 |
> Let's see case by case: |
24 |
> jmol, there are a few differences between mine and the science overlay, |
25 |
> jeffro and I are not in tune regarding EAPI and that's the main source of |
26 |
> differences (last time I looked). |
27 |
> fplll, givaro, iml, m4ri and polybori we are probably ahead. In fact we |
28 |
> probably put them in science in the first place. symmetrica and gap we are |
29 |
> probably ahead as well because I am not sure anyone else maintain them. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Synchronization requires some time. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> About merging. Why not if you are ok with our cruft.... |
34 |
|
35 |
Well, just remove the cruft ;) |
36 |
|
37 |
> like old pexpect that has moved out of the tree, our own python ebuild (until |
38 |
> 2.7.3 is finally released), I carry a special version of R for OS X on prefix |
39 |
> (have to fill the bug for that one). old networkx because the one we need as |
40 |
> dropped of the main tree.... |
41 |
|
42 |
One thing that comes to mind: Github has some really giganto-awesome |
43 |
features it seems. You seem to use them and since science is hosted on |
44 |
gentoo's infrastructure you don't have the issue tracker and online pull |
45 |
request mangling. Actually, it would be great to have those for |
46 |
science too. |
47 |
|
48 |
Cheers, |
49 |
Thomas |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
Thomas Kahle |
55 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ |