From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-scm@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration | ||
Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:07:53 | ||
Message-Id: | CAEdQ38GU_yZwMv6omZzns9OJ3j=2c0USWxGh5fUG93Rj-JhGrg@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > On 15:49 Tue 23 Aug , Lance Albertson wrote: |
3 | >> I think using the shortlog output is the sane solution otherwise you're |
4 | >> just replicating what you do in the commit. |
5 | > |
6 | > It's not replication if users continue to use rsync; they won't have |
7 | > commit info. |
8 | |
9 | Do we really want users to continue using rsync? Isn't git pull so |
10 | much faster? What's the downside of users using git directly? |
11 | |
12 | Matt |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |