Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] gentoo-x86 on git - Manifests
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:26:05
Message-Id: 200902200025.52049.reavertm@poczta.fm
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] gentoo-x86 on git - Manifests by "Robin H. Johnson"
On Thursday 19 of February 2009 22:36:03 Robin H. Johnson wrote:

> The 'Manifest' file committed by developers contains ONLY 'DIST' > entries. Every git action you do on your local tree would detect other > changes.
If it's free from any security flaws, then it's apparently win-win situation (a'ka "why store something that is already there - non-distfiles hash"). Issue related to Manifests needs to be solved somehow to fully gain from git transition. Still, what about git overlays that cannot utilize rsync method? This way they are no longer compatible with package manager and such method cannot be applied. It would be nice to have some common but working solution (if possible that is). And of course even gentoo-x86 cannot be just cloned and used as PORTDIR,.. unless, hmm, Manifests are fetched and then "fixed" (regenerating missing manifests lines) on "client side" using git hooks and updated (stripping non- DIST digests) and then commited using git hooks. Is it possible? -- regards MM

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] gentoo-x86 on git - Manifests "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>