| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Alec Warner wrote: |
| 5 |
>> I would imagine you are free to clone that and do whatever you want |
| 6 |
>> with it wrt to testing. Pushing the changes back onto o.g.o may not |
| 7 |
>> be a good idea at this time; depending on how well the patches work |
| 8 |
>> (it is nice to get people using them for a while). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The idea was to test an as-close-to-the-real-thing version of git |
| 11 |
portage as possible. Would repoman commit to the local repository and |
| 12 |
then push back to the main tree, or would repoman do the push to the |
| 13 |
main tree directly? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I could clone my clone to do local testing, but I thought the idea would |
| 16 |
be to try out some test/real commits to a large remote copy of the tree, |
| 17 |
and see how all the patches hold up? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Mike 5:) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkkfVjcACgkQu7rWomwgFXoxGACglr8otN45871UbA9cnsjYGWiI |
| 25 |
DWMAniQd1/Ma+bgAAq4E2CZ2N7G177tX |
| 26 |
=xZMY |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives