| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 5 |
> What if we took a slightly different angle with this. I'm not sure if |
| 6 |
> this is possible, so correct me if I'm wrong. Most developers don't need |
| 7 |
> history past a year, but having recent history is important. What if we |
| 8 |
> created an archive repo that contains all the history but the main one |
| 9 |
> only contains a years worth? If a developer did want the whole history, |
| 10 |
> they could just graft it onto the live repo. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yeah, as far as I'm aware the initial repo can be any length of time (a |
| 13 |
week old, a year old, etc), so that wouldn't pose a problem. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Anyways, I think devs should always have history, just not 5 years worth |
| 16 |
> of it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
True, it's getting it in the first place that's a bit of a strain on the |
| 19 |
ifrastructure... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Mike 5:) |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkmQn9MACgkQu7rWomwgFXrBkACeIQBHLXJwrhfC7wYd3LSgRuXm |
| 26 |
fPIAn0FHFQhmbVyxna7rIP1sU49tmWMm |
| 27 |
=MyTS |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives