| 1 |
On 08/23/2011 02:26 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Monday, August 22, 2011 15:28:57 Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Unresolved items: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> did we settle on the changelog autogeneration method ? |
| 7 |
> No. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> My personal opinion on it is that the ChangeLog isn't auto-generated |
| 10 |
> because it's NOT the same as the commit messages. The commit messages |
| 11 |
> are detailed technical info about a commit, while the ChangeLog is a |
| 12 |
> short version. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> If we want to enforce the changelog being the shortlog output, that's |
| 15 |
> doable as long as all devs actually use it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
1+ |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I think using the shortlog output is the sane solution otherwise you're |
| 20 |
just replicating what you do in the commit. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Lance Albertson |
| 24 |
Systems Administrator / Architect Open Source Lab |
| 25 |
Information Services Oregon State University |
Archives