Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:05:53
In Reply to: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration by "Robin H. Johnson"
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:28:57 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:28:29PM +0400, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >> Is there any progress since last update on cvs->git migration? > The list for it is gentoo-scm, not gentoo-dev. > > There's an experimental tree that mirrors CVS: > >;a=summary > > Unresolved items: > - commit signing > - thin Manifests > - merge policies > > In terms of the tree size question, we were going to produce a > zero-history point at the switchover time, and offer a graftable pack > with all prior history. This got the initial packfile down under > 80MiB > (with the historical packfile being ~900MiB).
Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already implented in funtoo) and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?). -- Best Regards, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics Gentoo Team Ru Gentoo Linux Dev mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com mailto:alexxy@g.o mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru