Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:05:53
Message-Id: a8e0cab4eb2c1982961e89332abb3445@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
In Reply to: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:28:57 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:28:29PM +0400, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
3 >> Is there any progress since last update on cvs->git migration?
4 > The list for it is gentoo-scm, not gentoo-dev.
5 >
6 > There's an experimental tree that mirrors CVS:
7 >
8 > http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
9 >
10 > Unresolved items:
11 > - commit signing
12 > - thin Manifests
13 > - merge policies
14 >
15 > In terms of the tree size question, we were going to produce a
16 > zero-history point at the switchover time, and offer a graftable pack
17 > with all prior history. This got the initial packfile down under
18 > 80MiB
19 > (with the historical packfile being ~900MiB).
20
21 Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already
22 implented in funtoo) and commit signing (this means gpg signing or
23 something else?).
24 --
25 Best Regards,
26 Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
27 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia
28 Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
29 Gentoo Team Ru
30 Gentoo Linux Dev
31 mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com
32 mailto:alexxy@g.o
33 mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru

Replies